In fact, the only things the attacker is not assumed to have is the password, and you (so you can’t be forced to reveal the password). – Lots and lots of hardware (think custom built supercomputers) and money, vast amounts of money (many, many millions of $). entirely offline and under the attackers control.
SECOND GALAXY ENCRYPTED DATA CODE
– Tools and skill to use, write and adapt code to try passwords/keys without interference of operating system or server authentication – i.e. – All the source code and technical documentation for the application. – One or more encrypted files, and the original decrypted originals for all but the file(s) being attacked. The attacker has access to the following: Remember that AxCrypt is designed to handle the following scenario: The Google Authenticator is still about proving identity – not possessing a secret. we don’t want to add features that many users believes increases security, while in fact it does not.Ī timeout for the sign in is in the works, by popular demand. Our main issue here is that we’d like to keep AxCrypt to be about *real* security, not *perceived*. With encryption, that doesn’t make sense, because there is no identity claim involved, it’s just about either posessing or not posessing the decryption key.Īll that being said, we’re thinking about the possibility of some hybrid system if we can figure something out that makes sense both from a security point of view, and from a user point of view. Two-factor authentication is about providing stronger evidence to support your identity claim. Encryption is not really about proving anything, it’s about either knowing or not knowing an encryption key. In the physical world, this might be a passport for example. to provide evidence to support the claim. Authentication is about proving to a system that you are who you claim to be, i.e. I’ll be writing a longer text on Authentication vs.
0 kommentar(er)
